🔍 Read the full analysis: Gewerkton’s Two-Day Design Sprint: Rebuilding A Brand Look With AI on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get monitors, keyboards and dev gear delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
TL;DR
Gewerkton says it moved its web and phone apps, Studio, icons and 529-page website to a new design called HORIZON during a two-day implementation on Oct. 2–3, 2026. AI coding agents carried out work from approved plans, while founder Thorsten Meyer reviewed and released each part; testing also found defects that required human fixes.
Gewerkton, a construction-site documentation tool, says it replaced the look of its web app, iPhone and Android apps, Studio, icons and multilingual website with a design called HORIZON on Oct. 2 and 3, 2026. The company says AI coding agents implemented the approved plans, while founder Thorsten Meyer reviewed the work and released each part, as detailed in the original analysis.
The reported scope included moving 281 hard-coded web-app colour values into design tokens, restyling 47 cards and updating phone app version 0.5.0. Gewerkton also re-rendered all 26 icons, updated Studio in light and dark modes, and refreshed a website comprising 529 pages in 40 languages. The company says 1,583 files were uploaded without an error.
Gewerkton also reports generating 228 AI film runs for five regions, including 222 regional versions, and producing eight help videos. The company qualifies the two-day timeframe: an interim design draft dated Sept. 26 was already available. The two days refer to implementation from the approved plan through the live website, not the entire design process.
Work followed written plans that laid out unresolved choices and recommendations. Meyer approved the plans, and the agents worked on a separate code branch. According to Gewerkton, no part was merged or delivered until he released it. Films showing the updated interface were held until he had reviewed the screens on Oct. 3; paid film reruns also required his explicit approval.
Human Review Shaped the AI Workflow
The account offers a detailed example of how a small software publisher used coding agents for a broad redesign while keeping decisions and release authority with a person. The agents handled implementation from written plans, but the process included approval gates for code, paid reruns and customer-facing films. Apple’s agreement requirement was another human-only step: Meyer had to accept the latest Program License Agreement before the iPhone build could proceed.
The reported checks also show the limits of automated testing for visual work. Gewerkton says the web app was reviewed in 200 views across four languages, three screen widths and light and dark modes. Yet a white tile behind an icon obscured nearby labels in dark mode; Meyer spotted it by inspecting the interface. The company says it corrected the icon treatment and layout the same evening. The episode is relevant to teams weighing agent-produced code: passing tests did not catch every user-facing defect.
Gewerkton disclosed that it was built by the publisher of the account, ThorstenMeyerAI.com. The figures and descriptions are therefore the company’s own reporting, not an independent audit. They can help readers understand the stated workflow, but do not by themselves establish that the same speed, quality or cost would apply to other products.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
A Redesign Across Five Product Areas
Gewerkton is described by its publisher as a documentation tool for construction sites, built in Iffeldorf, Bavaria, by Meyer, who directs a group of AI coding agents, including Codex and Claude. The HORIZON work covered several connected surfaces rather than just a website: the web app, mobile apps, Studio, icons and public site. That breadth made consistency across languages, screen sizes and light and dark modes part of the stated acceptance checks.
The design plan was not followed without changes. Gewerkton says its original cobalt colour measured 4.38:1 contrast against a light background, below the company’s working threshold of 4.5:1 under WCAG 2.1 AA. It darkened the colour to reach 4.80:1. The company also reports eight failing web-app tests across seven files; six files failed in the same way on the main branch, while another test depended on run order and passed on its own. Gewerkton says the redesign neither caused nor fixed those failures.
“The two days cover the execution, from the approved plan to the live website.”
— Gewerkton, in the publisher’s account
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Costs and Defects Still Need Detail
The source account’s cost section is incomplete: it gives an actual figure of about $134 for the films, but does not provide a finished breakdown or clarify whether that figure includes staff time, agent usage, review, software subscriptions or the wider redesign. It also does not give a comparable cost for a non-agent workflow, so the figure cannot establish savings.
Some production details remain open. Gewerkton says film generation was paused after round nine, when 208 of 228 runs were complete and 38% of jobs were failing; it reports that 76 failed jobs were not billed. The account says nine regional versions were later reshot with Meyer’s approval, but does not fully explain the final disposition of every film run. It reports five major findings from an Android test on a Pixel 10a, none considered blockers, without listing all five. The company’s results have not been independently verified.
multilingual website development tools
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Version 0.5.1 Is the Next Fix
Gewerkton says five findings from the Pixel 10a Android test are scheduled for version 0.5.1. One described issue involved camera-screen buttons breaking German words across lines after the redesign increased type size and padding. The account does not give a release date for that update.
The company says nine film runs were reshot after visual review and passed a further check. It also describes examining the middle frame of each of 157 mirrored films and viewing reworked films again at 10%, 50% and 90% of their duration. The next indications of how the relaunch is settling will be the release of the mobile fixes and any further updates Gewerkton provides about remaining film work, defects or costs.
automated UI icon rendering software
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What changed in Gewerkton’s redesign?
Gewerkton says it applied the HORIZON design to its web and phone apps, Studio, all 26 icons and a 529-page website available in 40 languages. It also reports 228 AI film runs for five regions and eight help videos.
Was the entire redesign completed in two days?
Not from the initial design stage. Gewerkton says an interim draft dated Sept. 26 was carried into the work; Oct. 2–3 refers to implementation from the approved plan through the live website.
What role did AI agents have?
According to Gewerkton, coding agents implemented the work from written plans on a separate code branch. Meyer approved the plans and released each part after review; some tasks, including accepting Apple’s developer agreement, required his direct action.
What problems were found during the redesign?
A dark-mode icon treatment covered nearby labels, and automated film recolouring missed some red details in shadows or warm lighting. The account also reports Android button wrapping and existing web-app test failures that it says were not caused by the redesign.
How much did the project cost?
The account gives an actual cost of about $134 for the films, but the available cost information is incomplete. It does not establish the total cost of the redesign or provide a comparison with work done without AI agents.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
